Is FUT a better hair transplant procedure than FUE?

Is FUT a better hair transplant procedure than FUE?

Andrea  |  visitor  |  Punjab
  • 1 answers
Is FUT a better hair transplant procedure than fue ?
Dr. surendra chawla  |  Basic member  |  New Delhi
  • 127 answers
Both techniques are good and give good results. It is variable and depends upon the experience of person of performing a particular technique. Both techniques have their pros and cons.
Dr Surendra Kumar Chawla
South Delhi cosmetic clinic
Professor Dr. Adel Wilson MD, FRCS  |  Basic member  |  Fellow of the European Board of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery  |  Cairo
  • 184 answers
They are not competitive techniques but complimentary. Each technique is more suited to a particular patient, and that is where thae art of plastic surgery comes.
Medco International Centre for Plastic Surgery  |  Premium member  |  Istanbul
  • 74 answers
Dear Andrea,
Please note that the FUT method is an old technique, and with the FUE technique we definitely get very good results. We can transplant up to 5,000 grafts depending on your donor area.
We can give you a package price including the Hair Transplant, medication and 3 days Hospital stay as well.
If interested please contact us through

Dr. Ahmed ALTAN MD  |  Premium member  |  Surgery  |  Istanbul
  • 27 answers
FUT is not a better hair transplant operation then FUE or MicroFUE except some special cases. And with FUE graft count is higher and without any scar or pain.
Dr. Anil Garg  |  Basic member  |  Indore
  • 1 answers
FUE and FUT are both techniques of hair transplant are good provided done properly by a trained experienced surgeon. Both techniques have their advantages, indications, and contraindications. A good hair transplant surgeon should know both the techniques and use his wisdom to select the technique and also the preference of the patient.
Medicalaest  |  Premium member  |  Plastic surgery  |  Istanbul
  • 105 answers
FUT method is the transfer of a slice from the back of the head (donor area). The wound is then closed completely so that there is no trace of its position. This segment is then cut into small parts (containing only one or three hairs) by the microscope and magnifiers. Scarring on the back is a small line and depends on the flexibility of the person's scalp and the nature of his body, but there is no swelling in this way.
FUE method is non-surgical: it depends on taking single bulbs or grafts (kraft) one by a modern tool 1 mm from the donor area back or side that healed immediately after 48 hours of operation and this method is never painful and a person can exercise his normal life immediately and can travel There is no facial swelling or scarring.
So FUE is better than FUT.

Medicalaest CLINIC
More reviews like this
  It's worth it
Ein sehr erfahrene und sympathische Arzt. Über meine Aufenthalt in der Türkei und anschließend in der Klinik kann ich nur positiv bewerten. Alles hat super geklappt. Sehr gut organisiert. Mein... More 
  It's worth it
Hello, I had an FUE hair transplant which provide excellent service, good technology and also a very nice price for their good reputation. They have implanted 3500 grafts at the Dr. Emrah cinik... More 

Related videos

Relevant procedures

Related indications

Specialists near you